concept
We sell not an interpretation but a completed case
The niche “artificial intelligence reads an electrocardiogram” is taken. We work in the niche “the machine prepares a legally significant document, the physician authorizes it, and the whole chain can be produced at a click”.
Two surfaces
Two surfaces of one loop
The workplace of the functional-diagnostics physician and the self-monitoring app for the patient. These are not two products in one storefront but two sides of one infrastructure.
The study is uploaded — the pipeline builds a draft conclusion — the physician edits it and authorizes it with a qualified electronic signature — the document is formed as a structured electronic medical document and goes for registration. The patient’s interface works in the same way: a recording made at home reaches the physician already read, not raw.
How it is built
Why this is one product and not two
Self-monitoring without a physician runs into a ceiling of trust: a smart watch or another device that records an electrocardiogram has shown something, and there is nowhere for the person to take it. A physician’s workplace without a flow of recordings rests only on what the patient brought into the room.
Joined together, the two surfaces give what neither of them gives alone. A person records an electrocardiogram at home — and the case reaches the physician as a structured draft, not as a photograph in a messenger. The physician authorizes it — and the document appears in the patient’s record, while the clinic closes the case. A physician’s dispute or doubt is not lost: the remark goes into the analysis loop de-identified, and the rule for reading the signal is refined.
The difference
Four properties the alternatives do not have
- The physician authorizes; the machine does not sign. A draft always stays a draft. Only the physician’s signature gives the document its authority. This is not a lawyer’s caveat but a load-bearing structure: a snapshot of the document’s bytes is signed, and the signature is verified over those same bytes.
- Every line of the reading protocol can be explained. The conclusion rests on findings; behind them stand a versioned rule, the signal window, the recording-quality assessment and the terms of a validated knowledge graph — not the weights of a model.
- One session — from the signal to a registered document. The physician does not assemble the structured document by hand and does not go into another system to submit it.
- A physician’s disagreement improves the system, not the synopsis. A rejection leaves not as an edit to the text of the conclusion but as a de-identified remark into the analysis loop, where the reading rules themselves are corrected — by an act and with a version.
Who this is for
What this means for you
For a clinic — a draft conclusion by the time the physician sits down to the case, and after the appointment a medical document assembled and signed in one window. For a patient — a case summary and a conclusion on their own ECG recording as an informational draft and a reason to see a physician, not a diagnosis from a screen. For a physician in private practice — a prepared draft of the reading and of the conclusion that has to be signed. For a partner and a manufacturer — the programming interface of the pipeline: from receiving an ECG with its clinical context to a document signed by a physician.
Limits
The limit
HealthOS Cardio is not a medical device: the product prepares a draft of a medical document, and the diagnosis is authorized by a physician. What is sold and what is not — on the page “Limits and responsibility”.