the cardiologist's workplace and the patient's self-monitoring
A guideline-based conclusion with the physician's signature
HealthOS Cardio takes an electrocardiogram of any length from the signal to a signed medical document: the reading follows the rules of clinical guidelines, and the evidence is produced at a click.
Two surfaces of one loop · Russia, the data do not leave the loop · status: pilot program
Who this is for
Who this is for
For clinicians
Reading an electrocardiogram is not enough — the case has to be closed with a document. What the workplace includes and where it works.
Open →For you and your family
A case summary and a conclusion on your own recording as an informational draft: what you get and what you do not.
Open →For private physicians
The draft is ready by the time you sit down to the case: signature and document in the same window. What you need in order to start.
Open →For partners
The path from signal to signed document inside your own solution: the structured document stops being a cost center.
Open →For OEM manufacturers
Your device and your interface: our path to a signed document. An embeddable core under an OEM license with the right to embed.
Open →HealthOS Cardio is not a medical device. The machine does not make a diagnosis and does not sign the document: a physician authorizes the draft conclusion with a qualified electronic signature. On the patient's side it is an informational draft and a reason to see a physician. Limits and responsibility →
Two surfaces
What a clinic buys
The draft conclusion is ready by the time the physician sits down to the case. Signature, structured medical document and submission — in one window. The completeness of the mandatory fields is checked before submission instead of coming back as a rejection from the registry.
What a patient gets
A case summary and a conclusion on their own ECG recording — as an informational draft. A reason to see a physician, not a diagnosis from a screen.
Scenarios
Where this works
The functional-diagnostics room
The health-screening flow: there are many studies, and the functional-diagnostics physician is the bottleneck.
A district hospital
Electrocardiograms are recorded, and there is no one to read them.
A regional center
The flow of several medical organizations analyzed in one place.
A person at home
The reading of an electrocardiogram taken with their own device.
The difference
How we are different
We answer for the reading: its provability, its reproducibility and its attainability on a recording of any length.
We do not compete on the accuracy of the output — we answer for its provability and its attainability. The unique proposition: the combination of a provable output and the attainability of that output on an electrocardiogram of any length.
Verifiable
What backs this up
Standards
The instrumental examination protocol in the SEMD-224 and CDA R2 format, the physician's qualified electronic signature, the registry of electronic medical documents.
More →Limits and responsibility
What the product sells and what it does not: the physician authorizes, the machine does not sign.
More →Sources
Where every figure and every claim on this site comes from; external figures come with a link to the primary source.
More →On 3 August 2026 Rospatent issued a decision to grant a patent for the invention “A method for the semantically correct automatic reading of an electrocardiogram and the identification of life-threatening risks, and a system implementing it”, application No. 2025138300/14 of 12 March 2026. A decision to grant is a stage of the state examination: the details of the patent are settled after registration and publication of the grant. The news item on the HealthOS ICU site →